Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tell Me Another Morning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep - Nomination withdrawn --Mdann52talk to me! 13:45, 5 February 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Tell Me Another Morning[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Non-notable book, does not meet WP:NBOOK guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)~~ Withdrawn - --ukexpat (talk) 13:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment FWIW, here are some reviews in seemingly reliable sources: 1, 2, 3, 4. I'm not familiar with reliable sources for cinema, so these might be worthless. Paviliolive (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. [1] (PW: "Berger's heart-wrenching novel is an early eyewitness account of the holocaust, and this welcome reissue deserves a wide audience, particularly in high school and college curriculums.") [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8][9] [10] [11] [12] [13] (Jung Journal: "It is so poetical and lyrical and the experiences so simply stated that it is like no other book on the Holocaust experience I have ever read.") --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:42, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete No assertion of notability, for one thing. The mere existences of reviews of books does not establish notability. Mangoe (talk) 23:48, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reviews are explicitly included as meeting criterion 1 of wp:NBOOK. If any of those sources are remotely third party and reliable (and I'm pretty sure several of them are) then this is clear cut. Neonchameleon (talk) 00:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm tempted to close this as a speedy keep but since I've done a fair amount of editing to the article I'll refrain. In any case, the book has received a large amount of reviews in reliable sources- which counts towards notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:28, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.