Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tejasvi Surya (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tejasvi Surya[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet not officially announced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunudoy (talk • contribs) 11:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC) 11:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Keep: now passes WP:NPOL Ceethekreator (talk) 12:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which blocked/banned user are you referring to in your G5 rationale? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:22, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Hold~~ for next 2-3 hours to confirm his win. Then article can be kept. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:19, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dharmadhyaksha: sorry typo, actually meant G4. Ceethekreator (talk) 13:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. However, changing to Speedy Keep now. He won. Passes WP:NPOL. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep pending confirmation of subject's election to the Indian parliament. It would have been better if both the re-creator of the article and the AfD nominator had waited until the ink was dry on the results papers before taking their respective actions, and the original article had problems beyond the notability questions, but assuming the reported results are correct, subject now clearly passes the notability standard. --Finngall ^talk 14:08, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even without his (almost certain) confirmation, he's notable enough. Coderzombie (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Already won the election of Indian Parliament. Jaywardhan009 (talk) 23:00, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:POLITICIAN now elected to Indian Parliament from Bangalore South.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and close. This AfD is now redundant since the subject has won the election and is now notable per WP:NPOLITICIAN. Also User:Capankajsmilyo (who started this page) should be trouted for jumping the gun by several hours, which led to this AfD and wastage of community time. I would request any patrolling admin or volunteer to close this and rid this AfD of its misery. --DBig Xrayᗙ 09:40, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is true that was technically created slightly prematurely — we should indeed wait until the subject has actually been declared elected, rather than jumping the gun just because he's in the lead during the ballot count — but we've already crossed that bridge now. Bearcat (talk) 13:46, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:POLITICIAN (Highpeaks35 (talk) 02:36, 25 May 2019 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.