The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A disambiguation page with two entries. If you remove the photo and the POV definition, you end up with a dicdef. Ruby 13:39, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Interested parties could just look at Chris Jennings' article rather than read this poorly-spelt dictdef. (aeropagitica) 13:47, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Ruby as quickly as possible. --Lockley 14:24, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. --Kinu 18:42, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
