Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tedi Cara

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. I could have sworn that only the Superliga was listed at WP:FPL, but apparently not. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tedi Cara[edit]

Tedi Cara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he is a professional footballer playing with a professional club. He has, however, not played in a fully professional league, as required by WP:NFOOTBALL. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – I can't find any WP:SIGCOV, but SW has him at 40 games in the Albanian 1st Division, which is WP:FPL-listed, but sourced only to the rulebook, which requires players to be "professional". Not sure that establishes that the Albanian 1st is fully professional. So, doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG, and I'm not sure about WP:NFOOTY either, if there isn't sufficient sourcing to justify the FPL listing. Levivich 03:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.