Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teddy Pickle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 05:06, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Teddy Pickle[edit]

I don't think this qualifies as a blatant hoax, but the article is as far as I can tell unverifiable and does not meet notability standards. Very few hits on google, most to Wikipedia or Myspace. Nothing on IMDb for the person or his film. No google hits for "Teddy Pickle" + "Pie Man". No evidence of any award nominations as claimed. Article is already userfied at User:Teddypickle. Beloved Freak 15:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 15:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely fails WP:V and therefore WP:BIO. If this isn't a hoax, it's an autobiography of a non-notable amateur film maker. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete unsourced. Jessi1989 (talk) 17:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsourced article fails WP:V and WP:Bio. Here's the myspace page for 'Teddy Pickle" where his personal description is nearly identicle to that in the article. Here's the Facebook page for "Robert James Snowden' and the image appears to be that of Mr. Pickle. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO on several counts, though it's WP:V violation isn't so bad, since it's so short. Meis funny Gab 18:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks like WP:HOAX -- a 21-year old is unlikely to be a multi-award winnner. If he is the awards ought to be listed. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.