Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technology of The Saga of Seven Suns (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Technology of The Saga of Seven Suns[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a list of fictional in-universe minutia that fails to establish notability or justify itself as a necessary article split. TTN (talk) 16:02, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 16:02, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 16:02, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 16:02, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no indication that this subject can support a stand-alone list. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 18:06, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It is clear that consensus is that lists of obscure fictional elements are inappropriate. (This should have been bundled with the species list nomination.) Clarityfiend (talk) 20:41, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Dartslilly (talk) 02:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.