Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tech Bureau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech Bureau[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Not meeting WPNCORP, only 3 sources with routine coverage of stolen money case. Not in-depth, not reliable independent. Ne (00) olli (talk) 13:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)~~ WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗plicit 14:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Internet, and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete one-event-based company. Unfortunately no NCORP and no RS. --BoraVoro (talk) 07:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The three sources used in the article are all RS. I also found coverage from outside Japan, [1], [2] and elsewhere in Asia [3], showing a more global view of the company. All articles are about the theft, but I think we have enough to build an article. Oaktree b (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all the sources mentioned don't meet Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Independent_sources especially when applying WP:SIRS guideline. 2A01:E0A:375:3810:B82B:91C2:DC5C:A05F (talk) 16:41, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the sources meet our GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.