Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechTarget

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 16:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TechTarget[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The text in this article was of a promotional nature, uncited and direct copvio from this site added by TechTarget IT Agenda (Diff)

They are a real company, but I've been unable to find any significant coverage from third-party sources. -- Hillbillyholiday ^talk 21:20, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 20. Snotbot t • c » 22:28, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Clicking on the Google News Archive link at the header of this discussion provides many reliable sources. Examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] (more exist). The article needs to be filled-in, due to content being removed per apparent copyvio that occurred. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:53, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Apologies. I searched the first few pages of google, but didn't think to check 'news'. I will remember to do that in the future. Those sources above do show that TechTarget have had media coverage. I request someone speedily close this as a Keep, as nominator I have changed my opinion. Sorry again. -- Hillbillyholiday ^talk 04:20, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.