Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeamXbox 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by User:SoothingR RN 21:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

TeamXbox

This page has been deleted five times and even has another AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeamXbox). It has also been speedied quite a few times [1]. Well, I guess it's time to clear the mess now. Let's gather consensus and settle this for once and for all.—♦♦ SʘʘTHING^(Я) 12:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: As you said it was deleted a few times (about 4, I think), I think you may consider wikipedia:speedy deletion in this case under the reason of Recreation of deleted material.--Wai Wai (☎) 14:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Most of the deletions seem to be in 2005 or before. But now that it was bought by IGN, wouldn't that allow it to pass section 3 of WP:WEB? --Icep 19:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It's page 1 ranked at Google for a "Xbox" search[2] and has 23 million hits for it.[3]. Highly notable website.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.101.201.248 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 14 August 2006
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 09:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep One of the most visited and highly recognized Xbox site on the net. Havok (T/C/c) 11:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Perhaps it was not notable then, however TeamXbox is the most notable Xbox site on the net, perhaps more notable then Xbox.com when it comes to information. I am sure the Alexa ranking has to be up there, anyone have it? --zero faults ^{|sockpuppets|} 12:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Ranked 3,142 on Alexa with over 20 million page views a day. --zero faults ^{|sockpuppets|} 12:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I'm withdrawing this nomination, you are all right in this matter. I wonder why I submitted this nomination in the first place... :/ —♦♦ SʘʘTHING^(Я) 14:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above --Peephole 16:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per RandyWang. --Ariadoss 19:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Uh, I didn't vote: the person above me forgot to sign their comment. I'm flattered, though. :) RandyWang (^{chat me up}/_{fix me up}) 23:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.