Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Hong Kong
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Doug Bell talk 06:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Hong Kong[edit]
Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Content of article is unencyclopedic and barely treats the topic. It is unclear to me whether there is any value in having a slew of articles Teaching English in Country X. (See Teaching English in Italy as an example of another article that has little or no encyclopedic value. It seems to me that, for the time being, our efforts should be focused on expanding Teaching English as a Foreign Language rather than having a slew of stubby little articles on Teaching English in Country X. Richard 23:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Is this just some person's attempt to make one of the themes in The King and I a full-blown article? Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 23:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or (if there's a compelling case to do so that I'm missing), merge to the larger article. There's nothing there currently to suggest that the Hong Kong experience is somehow different enough to be spun out from the main article. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 00:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I believe the slew of TEFL articles was originally started by the authors of American TESOL Institute; however, the content of this one seems to have come from elsewhere. Still not encyclopedic. --Alvestrand 07:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaching English in Italy closed as Delete. ~ trialsanderrors 09:01, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, may be acceptable in a journal of education but not in an encyclopedia Alf photoman 13:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.