Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Wiebers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No consensus on a redirect Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Wiebers[edit]

Taylor Wiebers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wiebers one claim to near notability is that she was Miss Iowa, that is not enough to establish notability. She has acted in local stage productions in eastern Iowa, but those are just not on a level to establish notability. My search for sources seemed to come up with the level of sources in the article. The way the reference list is made is a total mess, but so are the sources. One Quad Cities source did not even mention Wiebers name at all, let alone mention the routine it was being used to source. About a third of the sources are PR releases about her winning pageants. The rest is either local coverage from the Clinton County paper or coverage that mentions her incidentally or coverage related to her being Miss Iowa, none of the last shows the widespread coverage we would want to show this title is a notable one. John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:56, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I don't see anything approaching WP:N. She's been fairly successful in the beauty pageant scene, but I believe that's true of thousands of other young women. Joyous! | Talk 21:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Razr Nation 07:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Miss Iowa, at least. SSTflyer 03:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- I don't see a need for a redirect as the name is unlikely to be a valid search term. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.