Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Vixen (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Penthouse Pets (non-admin closure) Rainbow unicorn (talk) 03:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Vixen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails gng and pornbio. Howard stern interviews are not going t get you over the gng and the new york post articles mentions her in passing. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - well known, 14x interwiki, many nominations to awards, Penthouse Pet of the Year for 2010, She was a presenter at the X-Rated Critics Organization's and appeared on The Naughty Show and The Howard Stern Show. Notable. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 17:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For the record none of this has any policy basis at all.... Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Penthouse Pets: sources do exist, but most only cover the subject because she won the Penthouse Pet of the Year award, not because they deem her significant. Sure, Penthouse isn't an insignificant journal, but promotional or affiliated coverage does not count. Esquivalience ^t 00:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/redirect more or less per Esquivalience. That's the standard outcome for Pets who don't otherwise meet PORNBIO or the GNG. Fewer than half the Pets of the year have individual articles, and even some Playmates of the year have been redirected to Playmate lists. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 03:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Penthouse Pets - While I am still not willing to concede that being a Penthouse Pet of the Year is non-notable, it still appears (since the last AfD on this subject just last month) that the best option at this time for this article would be to redirect it. Guy1890 (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - Seems the norm for these so may aswell be redirected. –Davey2010^Talk 20:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.