Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Richardson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 06:48, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Richardson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Justification: insufficient notability both as a subject and for inclusion in several categories (e.g. space scientists). Most notable achievement is as a young community activist promoting science-related efforts. All other minor recognition, including several sourced articles, are merely reporting on or direct responses to the singular philanthropic achievement. 14.207.5.104 (talk) 02:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor. Above text is copypasted from article talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --Finngall ^talk 04:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 05:01, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 05:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found Time, NPR, ABCNews, Forbes, Christian Science Monitor. She is an activist who has been raising money since she was 9. A bit special I'd say. scope_creep^Talk 10:46, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I will not suggest deleting it. The article meets criteria, it just needs a little hand to rewrite it. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 10:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The coverage is at best short, human interest type stories. These are not the things that build actual notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:57, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:42, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sourcing is there so it should be kept. Subject has received coverage far beyond the local news outlets who typically report on the doings of school-age children. The focus of the article is correctly centered upon the present activist – who is clearly making waves – rather than the future astronaut. StonyBrook (talk) 15:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She meets WP:GNG with significant coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources, including NBC News, ABC News, The Florida Times, Mashable, and others, including People.com, Face2Face Africa, and this book: [1]. (I'm not sure we should have her full date of birth, though.) RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.