Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Leier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Leier[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NHOCKEY as he's never played above the AHL level and only two dozen games at that level. T.C.Haliburton^{talk nerdy to me} 01:49, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not yet notable. Another in a loooong line of articles of nn players created by now blocked editor. Reso lute 02:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Yet another in a string of hundreds of NN articles created by a now-indeffed editor with a long history of defying notability standards ... and, as in this article, was particularly intent on defying the consensus standard that players in youth tournaments weren't inherently notable. Fails NHOCKEY, no sign of passing the GNG. Ravenswing 16:38, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NHOCKEY. Can be re-created if he ever does. Patken4 (talk) 23:00, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails both NHOCKEY and GNG. Can be re-created if he ever manages to. -DJSasso (talk) 17:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.