Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Fawcett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Taylor Fawcett[edit]
- Taylor Fawcett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
nonsense — Ched (talk) 20:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete: The article's way sub-par, but the guy does appear to exist and to be in the show the article references. So the question's just whether he's notable enough for an article just now. Six episodes of a single TV show and no apparent substantial third-party discussion make me think not. Gonzonoir (talk) 20:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Also NB it's slightly less nonsensical than it was when you tagged it for AFD, Ched - it had been vandalized at the time. Gonzonoir (talk) 20:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. Not nonsense, but an appearance on one sitcom that appears to have flopped big-time isn't enough for notability. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 20:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Redirect To relevant TV series. Not enough (yet) for a full article, but there's no harm in pointing the page to a different place. TNXMan 20:57, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh yeah, forgot about that. Redirect.
- Withdraw, or redirect - article had multiple vandalism, by multiple IP's - Tnxman found real copy in history for me. Doesn't matter to me one way or the other really. — Ched (talk) 21:11, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.