Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor DeMario

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SmartSE (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor DeMario[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the GNG. BLP on a beauty queen whose only coverage has been on facebook, and her alma mater UDelaware. She's not like the last Miss Delaware who was a wannabe internet porn star. ColonelHenry (talk) 03:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor is a notable celebrity throughout the state of Delaware. She has had various interviews with credible news stations and other media outlets. She has also competed in a National Pageant and advocated for the MS Society around the state. A successful beauty queen such as Taylor should be note worthy, even though she did not participate in questionable behavior.If needed, I can source more news articles and other credible references to prove the legitimacy of this page. See Taylor as a contestant in the Miss United States Pageant: http://www.missunitedstates.com/#!find-your-state/c24ns This links to the Delaware Page where you can see she is the current titleholder.johnd88 (talk) 07:49, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not inherently notable as a Miss United States participant; even the winners and "notable past delegates" listed in the main pageant article are mostly redlinks. Volunteer work and some very minor modeling is also not notable. The references in the article do not provide evidence of the non-trivial, independent coverage in reliable sources she would need to meet WP:GNG. The UDaily link comes closest, but is only routine coverage of some non-notable (though undoubtedly admirable) charity work. I tried looking for more sources myself but wasn't able to come up with anything significant. If the page creator has access to additional sources it would be helpful to add them to the article, but please read WP:GNG to understand the kind of sourcing required. Camerafiend (talk) 01:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-reliable references on the page as it is and I can't find non-trivial sources that satisfy WP:GNG. PaintedCarpet (talk) 15:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWS-Cp1WgQY Here is a youtube video of Taylor being interviewed on the News in Delaware. If you view http://www.missunitedstates.com/#!find-your-state/c24ns you can click Delaware where you will see that she is the current title holder and a past contestant in the National Pageant. Also Click this link http://www.goingproentertainment.com/2013/12/going-pro-philadelphia-is-february-1.html to see she will be attending a Going Pro Entertainment event on February 1st. [(User: Johnd88|Johnd88]) 05:53, 30 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnd88 (talk • contribs)
Delete - I can't see anything to convince me that she is notable. Mabalu (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article does not have dependable sources. They do not appear to exist.Whitescorp34 (talk) 02:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.