Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tawnee Stone (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tawnee Stone[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, fails to meet WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO Tabercil (talk) 12:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - found nothing on a search. Off2riorob (talk) 12:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; the 'other version' (check article history) is nothing but personal information about an adult model gleaned from other crowdsourced websites; in other words, not reliable. --Golbez (talk) 12:30, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 15:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My reasons are unchanged from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tawnee Stone and the situation is unchanged. There are no good biographical sources in existence. A biography cannot be written here. Ironically, this recently re-created article stated outright what I said back then: we know the pseudonym, purported age, and job; and two out of the three are falsehoods. It also said that this was a trademark. Delete first and I have no objection to a redirect to Lightspeed Media Corporation once the bad biographical content is gone, just like the other completely unknown and falsely named Tori Stone and Jordan Capri do. Uncle G (talk) 15:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Complete failure of WP:GNG and the lesser WP:PORNBIO. Looking at the old AfDs is completely Facepalm inducing; I am so glad that the project's standards have evolved since then. Tarc (talk) 18:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:47, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 12:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.