Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatiana Zavialova

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:06, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tatiana Zavialova[edit]

Tatiana Zavialova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion aside, the article is unreliably sourced (Blogspot? Really?) and the model isn’t notable. Participation in the “prestigious” Elite Model Look contest is not an indicator of notability or success. Many completely unknown and unnotable models do the same thing every year. (Also, the Ford Supermodel of the World competition makes no mention of her. It’s odd that a model would participate in the competitions of two rival agencies if she “won” one of them already. Maybe it’s because it didn’t happen!) Trillfendi (talk) 16:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 17:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not seeing much if any coverage from independent sources. Article looks quite promotional as well. Highway 89 (talk) 01:14, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above, does not look like a notable model Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:38, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.