Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatarnikov Alexander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing early per WP:SNOW Mark Arsten (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tatarnikov Alexander[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails English Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines. And even that for artists. SarahStierch (talk) 03:01, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:27, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Despite the industrious addition of this person's biography across multiple Wikipedias (previously speedy-deleted here under the "DiezelSun" title in July under G11 & A7 criteria which seem about right), no evidence found of notability. AllyD (talk) 07:35, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability, no reliable sources found for "Александр Татарников" xудожник, "Александр Татарников" diezelsun or the Latin transcription of his name. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: cross-wiki spamming. (e.g. 柴油太陽 on zh_wp. ) -Mys_721tx (talk) 08:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, cross wiki spam. Just deleted this article at the Dutch Wikipedia because half of it was translated from this page which has no compatible license. This article looks like a translation as well. (I don't know if this is the original tekst of course but still. Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For information, we have just deleted the similar article on the Latin Vicipaedia, principally because there is no independent evidence of notability. Andrew Dalby 16:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.