Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tapash Chatterjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:19, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tapash Chatterjee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable and non elected politician with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Hello Umakant Bhalerao, thanks for reviewing Tapash Chatterjee. I have added more link from Times Of India, The Indian Express so now you can see alot of reliable sources. Now you can check and review the page. But I think this page have much reliable source right now. So I think this page should not be deleted. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jroynoplan (talk • contribs) 09:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Spam and promotional article. Fails WP:BASIC, WP:POLITICIAN Just being a deputy mayor of a municipality doesn't make the subject notable. RationalPuff (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~* Keep~~ Hello RationalPuff, i don't know whether those news link are spam or promotional. I have got those news link from Google. And I had put those on wikipedia. So the decision is totally on admin, is they will delete this page or they will keo the page on wikipedia. By the way thanks for joining the contest. Jroynoplan (talk — Preceding undated comment added 17:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Deputy mayor of a suburban city is not in and of itself sufficient grounds for a Wikipedia article: to qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia, the article would need to contain a lot more substance about his actual work in the role, and simply jengastacking sixteen references onto a statement that he exists, the end, is not enough. Bearcat (talk) 21:36, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jroynoplan (talk • contribs) 05:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC) RationalPuff (talk) 08:09, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add multiple votes which I have strikethrough. RationalPuff (talk) 08:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MILL - local politician from the outer boroughs. Bearian (talk) 12:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.