Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanyalee Davis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 03:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tanyalee Davis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this comedian sufficiently notable? Alligators1974 (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC) -[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - seems sufficient consensus - article needs a tidy up, but she is clearly famous enough to survive.Alligators1974 (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think so, given her appearance on UK national TV and the number of sources listed in the article. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is there in principle, as reliable source coverage of her comedy career does exist — that said, this article is terribly written and abysmally sourced in its existing state. For instance, many of the "references", which were contextlessly linkfarmed rather than properly footnoting any content, were primary sources rather than reliable ones. As noted, however, RS coverage of her does exist to clean this up with — I've already reviewed the linkfarm to sort out the valid references (which are now listed on the talk page) from the primary ones. Keep, but flag for cleanup. Bearcat (talk) 17:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully agree. Sensible option. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:43, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.