Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya James (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya James[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines in WP:PORNSTAR. (No awards & no mainstream media.) – S. Rich (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails PORNBIO without award wins. She would not even have passed the previous version of PORNBIO. Fails GNG without non-trivial coverage by multiple reliable sources. Even if you count an XBiz article, that's not enough. • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per accurate analysis by nom and by Gene93k. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with views expressed above. Finnegas (talk) 10:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.