Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya Ekanayaka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 07:15, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya Ekanayaka[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable subject and the article appears to be promotional in nature. Sakaimover (talk) 23:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep There are two pieces that are just barely more than WP:ROUTINE coverage in WP:RSs, so I'm leaning to a keep and not looking for additional refs. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:25, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:37, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I agree there are two (and only two that I have seen far) reliable independent sources. That does meet the requirements for WP:NMUSIC (although barely). -Obsidi (talk) 03:59, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Seems to have had some coverage, its not vast but it is there.Slatersteven (talk) 09:57, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think the sourcing currently in the article is just about sufficient, and I suspect there may be more sourcing in Sinhalese and/or Tamil, neither of which I am familiar with. --bonadea contributions talk 19:59, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per coverage. The article could do with some work though. Finnishela (talk) 15:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.