Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanvir Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Pakistan Automobiles Corporation cricketers. Daniel (talk) 22:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tanvir Khan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No coverage found. Störm (talk) 06:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WP:NCRIC. Or at worst, redirect to List of Pakistan Automobiles Corporation cricketers. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:39, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NCRIC. Nominator didn't do a WP:BEFORE to show the opposite. The nominator nominated (automatically) a large amount of cricketeers. It would have been better to made a bunch of them in one nomination. SportsOlympic (talk) 15:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge/redirect to List of Pakistan Automobiles Corporation cricketers. Nominally passes NCRIC, which by consensus only provides an extremely weak presumption of notability that is very unreliable for cricketers such as these (recent NSPORT discussion here), but fails all meaningful guidelines including GNG and SPORTCRIT. We do not have to wait for inadequate guidelines to be rewritten before dealing with inadequately sourced and unsourcable articles. Moreover NSPORT (including NCRIC) does not supercede GNG. No sources beyond wide ranging databases. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 17:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet GNG, which is the minimum guideline all articles must meet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Pakistan Automobiles Corporation cricketers, although I have some concerns about the commonness of the name in this case and could live with delete as an alternative. Trivial coverage of NCRIC but failure of GNG level of sourcing. It could be that he's one of the Tanvir Khan's that Google comes up with, but we have no way of knowing that from the sources so we need to not have a dedicated article until we can find suitable sources. Blue Square Thing (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect, doesn't meet the GNG, only a disputed and way too lax guideline. Fram (talk) 08:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.