Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanner Fresh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tanner Fresh[edit]

Tanner Fresh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:ARTIST. Sources are either dead, don't mention him, or are self-published, with the exception of this one article. One write-up in a local paper does not establish notability. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Do we have a word for a wall o' worthless citations? I'm not seeing any sources meeting the criteria of being reliable, independent, and providing significant coverage of the subject. We need multiple sources meeting all those criteria. Honestly, this looks very much like an article written by someone associated with the topic; the author has written articles on the record label founded by the subject as well as another artist under the same label. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's WP:BOMBARD, FYI. And yes, I'm noticing that a number of the articles related to this. (The group, the person, and the album) have a lot of deadlinks, suspeciously whenever it something about them charting it seems... Sergecross73 msg me 17:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.