Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tango en Tres

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tango en Tres[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently insufficient notability to meet WP:BAND. No reliable sources in the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:05, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails too meet GNG, as there's no reliable sources (and I couldn't find any), no relevant claims of notability, and also highly promotional intro. Alex^{discussion ★} 11:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely unsourced and even if it wasn't, there's nothing sufficient enough to make it past WP:MUSICBIO. Gm545 (talk) 12:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The band is mentioned in passing in various books, for instance by Jorge Strada in the book Historia orientativa del tango: 1880-1995, but there is no dedicated book coverage. Online sources fare rather better: Alternativa Teatral (dedicated biography of bandleader Julian Graciano), Argentina es Tango (dedicated coverage of Graciano), Recursos Culturales (combination of Graciano bio and band info), and Tinta Roja – Revista de Tango (interview with the band). These would not help much with BAND but they help toward WP:GNG. Binksternet (talk) 15:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. They're all in Spanish. If they do have significant coverage in the Spanish-language media, would it be more suitably moved to a different language-version? Gm545 (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC) Withdrawing as per language guidelines. Gm545 (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.