The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:44, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original research. First person references. Esprit15d 21:34, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism/original research. --Carnildo 21:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete original research, probably vanity Ikh (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, possibly move to the user's page. --Hansnesse 21:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
