Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taneraic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 16:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taneraic[edit]

This is a constructed language, and from reading the article there is no claim of notability - it was made up by a 13yr old who apparently made up lots of languages when he was that age, and only 1 person (maybe 2) has ever communicated in it. Having Charles Bernstein comment once on this so-called language doesn't seem like a reason to include it, IMHO Moglex 03:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no indication that there is any importance related to the development of this language. It is non notable. --Stormbay 18:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't appear to be any solid claims to notability.Alberon 12:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.