Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tampo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Silent treatment. Clear consensus for redirection, and no consensus for merging. The article's Revision history remains in place for a potential merge to be considered. This could be discussed at Talk:Silent treatment, if desired. North America1000 00:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tampo[edit]

Tampo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There seems to be no reason for this article to be separate from passive-aggressive behavior, silent treatment, or save face, especially when none of the linked sources are reliable enough to say that this behavior is unique to Filipinos. There's also the frankly bizarre parts that talk about this in the context of Filipino women being courted by Western men. This isn't a phenomenon unique to Filipino women, and it's not a phenomenon that can be generalized over Filipino women, especially without an academic source. The whole thing seems like some sort of (self-)exoticization; there isn't an article for "sulking," for instance. Mr. Gerbear|Talk 17:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Mr. Gerbear|Talk 17:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Mr. Gerbear|Talk 17:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I should also add that there are no available sources that discuss this as a primary topic, or as a topic that deserves special treatment separate from the other behavioral/psychological phenomena I mentioned. Essentially, the only appropriate content in this article is the definition of the word, which Wiktionary covers. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, neither is it a forum for dating advice. Mr. Gerbear|Talk 17:36, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.