Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamna Tamna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:34, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tamna Tamna[edit]

Tamna Tamna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a song by a band who don't have a Wikipedia article, not making any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The article is long and detailed enough that I don't feel comfortable speedying it A9, but the problem is that the detail in it isn't reliably sourced to real media coverage about the song: it's referenced 50 per cent to WordPress blogs and podcasts, and 50 per cent to a five-stacked reference bomb offering purely tangential verification of the existence of a different band whose video for a different song was supposedly a "sequel" to the video for this one, except absolutely none of the sources actually support that claim at all — they just verify that the other band exists, while completely failing to mention any connection whatsoever to this song or the band that recorded this song. Which means that the article is referenced exactly zero per cent to reliable sourcing that establishes the notability of this song. Bearcat (talk) 03:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:06, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, no claims to notability for the song, long rambling article that goes way off topic. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The nominator's analysis is airtight, and the article is not nearly as robust as it looks. The folks behind this song and video can document their development efforts all they want, but Wikipedia is not the place for it. The event they threw to promote the release was unnoticed by the media, and the song is only found in the band's own promotions and social media. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.