Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tami-Adrian George (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:38, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tami-Adrian George[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted article. Subject doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. No significant roles. Career is a series of minor movie roles and single appearances in shows. Rumor of being cast in a show that never happened won't get past it either. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree, ACTOR not met. Mostly bit-parts/one-offs. Article uses flowery language, seems promotional. No sources found for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 14:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and California. Shellwood (talk) 14:21, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Subject on principle, I feel is very notable. Despite that, recent notoriety public reception related to the subject, gives more proof of validity for the article. Article was deleted in a past AFD yes, but the article was formatted incorrectly, and not sourced properly. Also, article also went through a submission review, which mind you passed. So with that being said, I feel the article should stay. Bronoton (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What significant roles in multiple notable films or television shows has she had? And what notoriety? Keeping on principle isn't a valid reason. It's just WP:ILIKEIT. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh dear. Major character in Starship Troopers, and other series, such as Star Trek etc. Common recurring roles in both film and television. Capture footage/motion footage work in Video games. Also, a lot of WP:BIO, and WP:NACTOR nobility and notoriety, comes from reception. Ergo, in other words, does the subject have a trending support/reception base, which the subject also has that. Perhaps this is trivial, but as a Wikipedian thats a minority/of color myself, I feel there aren't that many Black female performers, I feel the subject has nobility perhaps on that too. So I feel I made my points clear enough, that I'm hoping you shall understand. If there are still any misconceptions, perhaps we aren't going to agree I'm afraid. I guess I can try to do some last minute revisions to this article, if the AFD doesn't get refreshed, but it's up to the admin as to whether the article stays, which I believe it should. But I said my piece. Thank you. Bronoton (talk) 22:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think your view of what a "major character" means needs some work. A single episode is not a major character. None of her TV roles are recurring. Her race and gender are irrelevant to this discussion. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject has only held minor roles in her film and TV appearances (almost all of which are one-episode bit parts). Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:49, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.