Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talkwalker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 02:01, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkwalker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

paid advertisement .Even if they were notable, this is in violation of the terms of use and should be removed. As for sourcing, Forbes is a promotional mention, as are the other articles. DGG ( talk ) 21:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 09:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ORGIND. No secondary coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep (talk) 19:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom SeraphWiki (talk) 16:27, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.