Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tales to Give You Goosebumps
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Goosebumps books. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:09, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tales to Give You Goosebumps[edit]
- Tales to Give You Goosebumps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article should be deleted in accordance to WP:N (was tagged for not citing any sources since August 2010). There is no significant coverage of this topic, and only trivial mentions. Also, all the necessary info on this topic is listed on List of Goosebumps books anyways. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:45, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, I agree the whole series and subsequent other series are pretty non-notable unless specifically examined by reviewers (which in fact is very few). Fearstreetsaga, are you looking at the other R.L. Stine books for ones that are in a similar state? As I am going through and tagging novels I am finding a lot of them in the same non-notable, minor plot summary state. Sadads (talk) 20:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, I agree with the above, but the article should be merged with List of Goosebumps books. -- d'oh! [talk] 01:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Goosebumps books because the content is already covered in its entirety there. Reyk YO! 00:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.