Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tales Of Nazir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a speedy renomination though I suggest separate nominations. Courtesy ping StraussInTheHouse. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tales Of Nazir[edit]

Tales Of Nazir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails film notability guidelines. I am also nominating two similar articles made by the same user for the same reason:

Agyakoo Gbegbentus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Potato Potahto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Sidechic Gang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The fourth of these articles details a film which did receive some award nominations but these awards in themselves are not notable and hence are not enough to satisfy WP:NFILM. Many thanks, SITH (talk) 17:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There were several more articles similar to these four, very short stubs about a Ghanaian film with scant sources, all by the same editor. In the majority of these cases that I've seen, I was able to find other coverage either in a web search or in a Google Scholar search that indicated that the subject met NFILM. That having been said, I was unable to find such coverage for Tales of Nazir or Agyakoo Gbegbentus, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone better versed in Ghanaian RS could dig something up. signed, Rosguill talk 18:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Rosguill: I did a pretty thorough (albeit machine translated) source search for all of them before submitting the AfDs and there wasn't anything that satisfied WP:NFILM. SITH (talk) 21:53, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't trying to cast aspersions, just pointing out that the set of similar articles is larger than the ones nominated here. signed, Rosguill talk 22:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:20, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. My previous keep !vote was solely about the movie Potato Potahto. Agyakoo Gbegbentus isn't a notable film; A Google search of the film doesn't show it being discussed in reliable sources. Sidechic Gang on the other hand appears to be semi-notable; although the film didn't receive reliable reviews, it was nominated for several awards at the 2018 AMAA.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 00:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to closer: I have a feeling this is going on (or off) the same rails as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axe of Vengeance. Both were crappy bundlings, for which I apologise. I see that the community prefers more separate AfDs as opposed to fewer tenuously linked bundles nominations. If you close it as trainwreck, please ping me so I can renominate the appropriate ones per the above consensus. Thanks, SITH (talk) 23:11, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.