Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taktum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:37, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taktum[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG and article does not also point out why she is important. Searches not returning anything positive either. Delete or maybe redirect? —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 16:13, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 16:13, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No proof of notability. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:24, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Seems NN to me. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.