Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take the Stage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy re-nomination (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:33, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Take the Stage[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not at all notable. Article created and majorly contributed to by a producer from the show. Can't find independent sources. Fails WP:GNG Rayman60 (talk) 23:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A Google News search for "Take the stage" and "Yobi.tv" shows 1 result which is [1]. The result is a press release. Therefore Take The Stage Fails GNG. CerealKillerYum (talk) 03:50, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious Keep - The article already contains three reliable sources, which satisfy GNG [2], [3], [4]. I'm not sure what this AfD is about but it's not notability. The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 13:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep perhaps because of the sources above, there may not be a large amount of resources here, but it seems enough. SwisterTwister talk 21:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 11:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 17:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.