Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take On the World (Pseudo Echo song)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 (HAPPY 2022) 04:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Take On the World (Pseudo Echo song)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Take On the World (Pseudo Echo song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Blank and Redirect to Race (album). The song does not meet WP:NSONGS. Its closest argument for that is winning the World Popular Song Festival, but that is not considered a major music award per NSONGS. The song itself does not seem to have WP:SIGCOV that would bring it to meeting WP:GNG either. snood1205 17:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. snood1205 17:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. snood1205 17:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. snood1205 17:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. snood1205 17:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Race (album) Simple search returned no sources to contribute to GNG, song does not appear to be notable, redirect per WP:NSONG Justiyaya 19:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Don't think that winning a significant music reward is by its self enough to establish notability. Winning a significant music reward would "suggest that a song or single may be notable enough that a search for coverage in reliable independent sources will be successful" per WP:NSONG. Justiyaya 19:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No brainer, 100% keep. This song won a well-known (at the time) international song competition. I’m not sure why this was even considered for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobyjamesaus (talk • contribs) 21:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Per Justiyaya's comment above, a song winning an award does not make a song inherently notable. snood1205 02:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Tobyjamesaus: My comment above states that based on WP:NSONG, simply winning a major music reward is not enough for an article to be notable... Did I misinterpret the wording of the NSONG here, or is there another guideline/policy that I'm not aware of? Thanks, Justiyaya 11:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Per Justiyaya's comment above, a song winning an award does not make a song inherently notable. snood1205 02:37, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Winner of significant (albeit historical) international song comp, ergo WP:NSONG. MagentaSwann (talk) 01:35, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Won a significant international song comp to meet WP:NSONG. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:NSONG per above arguments. SBKSPP (talk) 00:58, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.