Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takami Yoshimoto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ansh 666 18:44, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Takami Yoshimoto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of several dozen articles created by same user that has poor sourcing (wikia or imdb) and I can find nothing to indicate they meet inclusion standards and the entry on ja.wp or zh.wp is no better sourcing wise CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:05, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have no comment on the user who created the article, but this is a clear keep. While Yoshimoto's peak of fame was the 1990s—which means there is less on the internet right now—there is still enough to indicate her notability, with many articles talking of her past role on Ultraman Tiga, her acting career, and personal milestones like marriage and childbirth: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], etc. These vary in significance but they are a good indication of what is not on the net. I checked Web Oya to see what the Oya Soichi Bunko has, and they list her as appearing in 161 articles in the popular press between 1992 and 2017. She was also noted for her acting, and won the Best Actress award at the Japanese Professional Movie Awards in 1999[10]. Michitaro (talk) 11:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 20:45, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the multiple reliable sources identified above including significant coverage which enable both WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG to be passed Atlantic306 (talk) 19:17, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.