Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tajik Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to list of Wikipedias. SoWhy 22:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tajik Wikipedia[edit]
- Tajik Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced, non-notable website, just because it is a wiki, it is not article worthy, it must have coverage in reliable sources. MBisanz talk 05:54, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of sources in evidence. Having an article on everything Wiki, regardless of notability, is a form of bias. --Rividian (talk) 06:41, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn site per 7,300 articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.96.123.217 (talk) 07:24, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - leaving something that's a wikipedia just because it's a wikipedia is bias, as there aren't any reliable/notable secondary sources for this. DavidWS (contribs) 15:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to list of Wikipedias. A list of language versions is a reasonable split of the Wikipedia article; individual articles on Wikipedias that do not even approach WP:GNG are unacceptable. the skomorokh 20:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Wikipedia 76.66.198.46 (talk) 05:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —ApprenticeFan (talk) 14:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to list of Wikipedias. - DustyRain (talk) 17:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.