Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tajamul Islam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tajamul Islam[edit]

Tajamul Islam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable kickboxer. Does not meet WP:KICK. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:15, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:16, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, so the WKF is not seen as a major kb organisation? Coolabahapple (talk) 04:34, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:KICK.Peter Rehse (talk) 10:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
thanks. Coolabahapple (talk) 17:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Article is about an 8 year old female kickboxer who doesn't meet WP:NKICK, WP:GNG, or WP:NSPORT. Success in junior sporting events is not generally notable, the notability criteria for kickboxers are obviously not met, and I don't think the reporting of results and upcoming events is sufficient to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 03:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 10:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.