Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taj Mohammad Khan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taj Mohammad Khan[edit]

Taj Mohammad Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of Rawalpindi cricketers or similar Has played 1 List-A match, but I could find no coverage. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY where a player with 1 or a few appearances but no coverage, are deleted/redirected. Note the CricketArchive external link on the page is for another player. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:GNG, only sourced to scorecards, cannot find any sources in English. SportingFlyer T·C 23:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete none of the sources amount to the substantial coverage needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence that this player ever received significant coverage, no apparent alternative to deletion available Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.