Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taipei Community Services Center
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Although there are as many delete !votes (including the nomination) as keeps, the deletes are based on lack of sources, and the keeps subsequently provided several unchallenged sources. Rlendog (talk) 16:20, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Taipei Community Services Center[edit]
- Taipei Community Services Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This organization does not seem notable, and I can't find any good sources for it. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GNG. The two references do not count as significant coverage from independent sources. In retrospect, this would have been a strong candidate for speedy deletion WP:CSD under criterion A7. Logical Cowboy (talk) 22:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For searches also try trad. Ch.: "國際社區服務文教中心 and also "The Community Services Center". icetea8 (talk) 04:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This organization certainly gets plenty of media coverage. I found 92 hits (58 deghosted) on the Taipei Times site. They put out their own English-language magazine as well. Kauffner (talk) 10:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If Taipei Times isn't enough, The China Post has another 26 (16 deghosted) hits for this organization. Kauffner (talk) 06:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Topic passes WP:GNG. Here's some sources added to the article:
- Rickards, Jane (September 16, 2005). "Gov't plans for ICRT dangerous, CSC says". The China Post. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
{{cite web}}: External link in|publisher=|publisher=(help) - Rickards, Jane (October 15, 2006). "Community Services Center kicks off annual fund raiser". The China Post. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
{{cite web}}: External link in|publisher=|publisher=(help) - Wang, Erika (May 6, 2007). "Hundreds scale Taipei 101 in charity Climbathon". The China Post. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
{{cite web}}: External link in|publisher=|publisher=(help) - Lok-sin, Loa (May 06, 2007). "Hundreds climb world's tallest building for charity". Taipei Times. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help); External link in|publisher=|publisher=(help)
- —Northamerica1000(talk) 00:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Rickards, Jane (September 16, 2005). "Gov't plans for ICRT dangerous, CSC says". The China Post. Retrieved March 29, 2012.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.