The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 04:47, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Fan-cruft, already covered in Characters of Lost, and uses non-canonical article names. --DDG 17:47, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per the nomination. Any content these pages may cover is already contained in any of the main character pages or the Characters of Lost page. The core Lost pages already stuggle mightily with speculation and cruft, and we don't need pages like this to make matters worse. Baryonyx 02:11, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
