Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahir Shamshad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tahir Shamshad[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another puff piece article. Fails WP:BIO. Refs are all trade papers. scope_creep (talk) 21:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have as yet no opinion about notability, but must point out that the statement that "refs are all trade papers" is blatantly untrue. Two of the sources cited are national non-trade newspapers. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or cut down on the lede, which reads like a resume.74.70.146.1 (talk) 04:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources are too meager. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.