Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahir Malik

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Note: No mention of Urdu language searches. czar 21:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tahir Malik[edit]

Tahir Malik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having LinkedIn and Facebook profiles does not count towards notability, and the third ref is a YouTube video. Subject isn't passing WP:BLP here. A loose necktie (talk) 20:45, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:09, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:09, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I wasn't able to find any independent sources showing the subject's notability, but was holding off on nominating this in the hope that author would add something else. Simply being a journalist or a television host is not notable. As the nom pointed out, the current sources are useless. No evidence he passes WP:JOURNALIST, WP:ANYBIO or WP:BASIC Meters (talk) 04:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for lack of sources, that is, my searches aren't finding sources and there are none on the page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No independent/reliable sources. Simply fails all notability guidelines. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - all three sources are original research and not reliable. There's no way to verify, unless somebody can find something better. Willing to change my mind. Bearian (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No reliable sources. - MA Javadi (talk) 16:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.