Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahdra Monastery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tahdra Monastery[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No information was found anywhere about it, only wikipedia-related. Also in search engines. SHould be deleted and removed from template TheNeon (talk) 13:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Why haven't you notified the creator of the article? It's part of the process. The guy seems to have created many such articles. --_Sulmues^{Let's talk} 15:11, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have inspected all the stubs of monasteries in Bhutan. Many of them really exist (I can find them in Google, Guide book, on the map etc. But only two I could not find, so, I aply to delete these two only. TheNeon (talk) 22:23, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete LIke the nominator, I could find absolutely no independent sourcing outside of wiki sites - not even confirmation that it exists. --MelanieN (talk) 00:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 06:02, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and remove from template. I can find nothing to confirm it exists, and thus it is non-notable even if it isn't a hoax. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 06:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to be no sourcesSlatersteven (talk) 18:31, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.