Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taeveen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, no prejudice against recreation provided reliable sources have been found.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taeveen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Google search does not show anything. Fails WP:NLI Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:GEOLAND is a guideline, unlike WP:NLI, and it recommends that any place that is legally recognized is considered notable, even if the population is low. (I personally do not like that guideline, but that's the way it is!) The question is whether this place has legal recognition - I did not find a source for that. Tigraan (talk) 11:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google maps is pretty good at, by now, having every podunk hamlet listed...and Taeveen is a nada. Pax 02:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find any mention of this in any source anywhere. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:V unless this is a nonstandard transliteration from the local language. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 19:17, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Usually most areas get kept .... But I can't find anything to even confirm its existence, There's absolutely nothing on Google Maps .... So either this is a Hoax or simply a very unknown area so will have to say Delete. –Davey2010^Talk 22:57, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.