Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taco Palenque

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After being relisted twice - there is no consensus to delete the article. (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:23, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Taco Palenque[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taco Palenque is not a notable restaurant. The only independent source I could find is this Houston Press source being cited here. This article looks a bit like promotionalism too. Editor Eat ma talk page up, scotty! 00:21, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a chain with 15 restaurants, of course it's notable enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.92.128.150 (talk) 14:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But there needs to be more independent coverage for there to be an article on this topic, not just a single Houston Press article and a primary source on the history of the restaurant. Sure, maybe there are a lot of restaurants in this chain, but just because of that does not mean it can be notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. No offense, but your argument is cleary one of those types to avoid, which are listed on this page. I don't know which one, but I know it has to be one of those. Please do not come up with any such argument again. Thank you. Editor Eat ma talk page up, scotty! 17:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It could be very well a chain of 50 castles, if there not enough coverage, it doesn't suffice its notability and its article should not be maintained. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 20:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as notable for the restaurant and also for the owner, who also founded the El Pollo Loco chain. Other reliable sources exist in Spanish, such as this one in La Opinion, part of a larger article on El Pollo Loco but with a detailed bio of the founder, but I found and added one more from an English language newspaper. There are more to be added and of course the article can be improved. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 22:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:59, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per User:Glane23, Taco Palenque is well known in Texas. Has 343,000 hits on google.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.