Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRAFFIK Advertising

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:13, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TRAFFIK Advertising[edit]

TRAFFIK Advertising (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company. Failed WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Promotional article by semi-undeclared (declared on user page, not on article talk page) paid advocate. Primary and non-RSes.

Sidenote: More concerning was the nature of this promotional article. A bit of digging revealed this editor was quite active in such activity in 2014, creating a number of similar articles on companies, many not notable, all promotional and failing NPOV. There was a poor attempt (i.e. incomplete, inadequate, and missing from article talk pages) at making a paid-advocacy declaration however it falls far short of what we'd expect. I will be going through this editor's work armed with TNT and AfD in the coming days but feel free to do so sooner. Rayman60 (talk) 21:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 21:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 21:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A firm going about its business. The listed awards are not notable in themselves and my searches are not finding substantial coverage about the firm. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 12:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.