Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TOI-4342 b
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 11:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
TOI-4342 b[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- TOI-4342 b (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no sources or indication of importance greyzxq talk 20:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I can find a published scientific paper about it[1] and the NASA website's entry[2] but little else. The article is unsourced. My only argument to keep would be that the exoplanet was recently discovered but Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL. We can't predict this will become notable.
- A question to the nominator about the timeliness of this AfD. How did you find and nominate this article for deletion an hour after its creation?[3] Saucysalsa30 (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- I used the Special:NewPagesFeed. greyzxq talk 22:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 04:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.